[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
:: Volume 0 - ::
3 2012, 0 - : 0-0 Back to browse issues page
Jadesada Palasuk * , Jeffrey A. Platt , Sopanis D. Cho , John A. Levon , David T. Brown , Suteera T. Hovijitra
Indiana University School of Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Abstract:   (1127 Views)

 Clinical Relevance

  To obtain high repair bond strength on aged silorane composite, aluminum oxide sandblasting should be used as a surface treatment procedure. After aluminum oxide sandblasting, either silorane composite with the LS system adhesive or methacrylate composite with a methacrylate dental adhesive can be used.

 SUMMARY

  Objective: This laboratory study compared the repaired microtensile bond strengths of aged silorane resin composite using different surface treatments and either silorane or methacrylate resin composite.

 Methods: One hundred eight silorane resin composite blocks (Filtek LS) were fabricated and aged by thermocycling between 8°C and 48°C (5000 cycles). A control (solid resin composite) and four surface treatment groups (no treatment, acid treatment, aluminum oxide sandblasting, and diamond bur abrasion) were tested (N=12 blocks, 108 beams/group). Each treatment group was randomly divided in half and repaired with either silorane resin composite (LS adhesive) or methacrylate resin composite (Filtek Z250/Single Bond Plus). After 24 hours in 37°C distilled water, microtensile bond strength testing was performed using a non-trimming technique. Surface topography after surface treatment was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Failure mode was examined using optical microscopy (50×).

 Results: Weibull-distribution survival analysis revealed that aluminum oxide sandblasting followed by silorane or methacrylate resin composite and acid treatment with methacrylate resin composite provided insignificant differences from the control (p>0.05). All other groups were significantly lower than the control. Failure was primarily adhesive in all groups.

 Conclusion: Aluminum oxide sandblasting produced microtensile bond strength not different from the cohesive strength of silorane resin composite. After aluminum oxide sandblasting, aged silorane resin composite can be repaired with either silorane resin composite with LS system adhesive or methacrylate resin composite with methacrylate dental adhesive.


 Source: Operative Dentistry

 Full Text

     
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Cosmetic and Restorative Dentistry
Received: 2013/04/9 | Accepted: 2015/12/16 | Published: 2015/12/16
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 0 - Back to browse issues page
جامعه اسلامی دندانپزشکان Islamic Dental Association of IRAN

کلیه حقوق سایت متعلق به جامعه اسلامی دندانپزشکان ایران است. تماس با ما

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4714