[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
:: Volume 1, Issue 1 And 1 (1-2012) ::
3 2012, 1(1 And 1): 0-0 Back to browse issues page
Microdamage of the cortical bone during mini-implant insertion with self-drilling and self-tapping techniques: A randomized controlled trial
Surnit Yadav * , Madhur Upadhyay , Sean Liu , Euqene Roberts , William P. Neace , Ravindra Nanda
Health Centre, University of Connecticut, Franington, Conn
Abstract:   (4036 Views)
Introduction

 The purpose of this research was to evaluate microdamage accumulation after mini-implant placement by self-drilling (without a pilot hole) and self-tapping (screwed into a pilot hole) insertion techniques. The null hypothesis was that the mini-implant insertion technique would have no influence on microcrack accumulation and propagation in the cortical bones of the maxillae and mandibles of adult hounds.

Methods

 Mini-implants (n = 162 diameter, 1.6 mm length, 6 mm) were placed in the maxillae and mandibles of 9 hounds (12-14 months old) with self-drilling and self-tapping insertion techniques. The techniques were randomly assigned to the left or the right side of each jaw. Each hound received 18 mini-implants (10 in the mandible, 8 in the maxilla). Histomorphometric parameters including total crack length and crack surface density were measured. The null hypothesis was rejected in favor of an alternate hypothesis: that the self-drilling technique results in more microdamage (microcracks) accumulation in the adjacent cortical bone in both the maxilla and the mandible immediately after mini-implant placement. A cluster level analysis was used to analyze the data on the outcome measured. Since the measurements were clustered within dogs, a paired-samples t test was used to analyze the average differences between insertion methods at both jaw locations. A significance level of 0.05 was used for both analyses.

Results

 The self-drilling technique resulted in greater total crack lengths in both the maxilla and the mandible (maxilla: mean difference, 18.70 ± 7.04 μm/mm2 CI, 13.29-24.11 mandible: mean difference, 22.98 ± 6.43 μm/mm2 CI, 18.04-27.93 P <0.05), higher crack surface density in both the maxilla and the mandible (maxilla: mean difference, 10.39 ± 9.16 μm/mm2 CI, 3.34-17.43 mandible: mean difference, 11.28 ± 3.41 μm/mm2 CI, 8.65-13.90 P <0.05).

Conclusions

 This study demonstrated greater microdamage in the cortical bones of adult hounds in both the maxilla and the mandible by the self-drilling insertion technique compared with the self-tapping technique.


  Source: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dento facial Orthopedics

  Full text

     
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Orthodontics
Received: 2012/05/12 | Published: 2012/01/15
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Yadav S, Upadhyay M, Liu S, Roberts E, P. Neace W, Nanda R. Microdamage of the cortical bone during mini-implant insertion with self-drilling and self-tapping techniques: A randomized controlled trial. 3 2012; 1 (1 and 1)
URL: http://idai.ir/article-1-503-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 1, Issue 1 And 1 (1-2012) Back to browse issues page
جامعه اسلامی دندانپزشکان Islamic Dental Association of IRAN

کلیه حقوق سایت متعلق به جامعه اسلامی دندانپزشکان ایران است. تماس با ما

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4713