[صفحه اصلی ]   [Archive] [ English ]  
جستجو در پایگاه

جستجوی پیشرفته
..
نظرسنجی
مطالب کدام بخش سایت بیشتر مورد نیاز شماست؟
پرسش و پاسخ
جشنواره شهید هدایت
کلینیک تخصصی دندانپزشکی
مجله علمی
نمایشگاه کتاب
نمایشگاه مواد و تجهیزات دندانپزشکی
نیازمندیها
   
..
:: جلد 0 - ترمیمی ::
جلد 0 - ترمیمی صفحات 0-0 برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Comparison of Acid Versus Laser Etching on the Clinical Performance of a Fissure Sealant: 24-Month Results
چکیده:   (1711 مشاهده)

 Clinical Relevance

  Etching of enamel with either acid or laser provides similar clinical performance of fissure sealants.

  SUMMARY

 Objective:

  To compare the clinical performance of a pit and fissure sealant placed with the use of different enamel preparation methods, i.e. acid or Er,Cr:YSGG laser etching, over 24 months.

  Methods:

  Sixteen subjects (15 female, 1 male) with no restorations or sealant present on their fissures and no detectable caries participated. Using a table of random numbers, a total of 112 sealants (56 with acid-etching, 56 with laser etching) were placed on the permanent premolar and molar teeth. All restorative procedures except for application of the laser were performed by the same dentist. After completion of the fissure preparation either with acid or laser, the adhesive was applied then a pit and fissure sealant, Clinpro Sealant, was placed and polymerized. Clinical evaluations were done at baseline and at 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow-up visits by two calibrated examiners, who were unaware of which etching method had been used. The retention of sealants and caries were evaluated with the aid of a dental explorer and an intra-oral mirror. Each sealant was evaluated using the following criteria: 1=completely retained 2= partial loss 3= total loss. The Pearson chi-square test was used to evaluate differences in the retention rates among the sealants used with different etching methods.

 Results:

  All patients attended the 24-month follow-up visit and all sealants were evaluated (total recall rate 100%). At the end of 24 months, 83.9% of the sealants from laser group and 85.7% of those from acid-etch group were recorded as “completely retained”. There were no statistically significant differences in retention rates among the preparation methods after all evaluation periods (p>0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the retention rates of premolar and molars at each evaluation period. No secondary caries was detected in association with any sealants.

 Conclusion:

  The clinical performance of fissure sealants placed after acid or Er,Cr:YSGG laser etching was similar.


 Source: Operative Dentistry

 Full Text

     
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: ترمیمی
دریافت: 1392/10/23 | پذیرش: 1392/10/23 | انتشار: 1392/10/23
ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله
نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:


Comparison of Acid Versus Laser Etching on the Clinical Performance of a Fissure Sealant: 24-Month Results. 1. 1390;

URL: http://idai.ir/article-1-2699-fa.html



بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.
جلد 0 - ترمیمی برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
جامعه اسلامی دندانپزشکان Islamic Dental Association of IRAN

کلیه حقوق سایت متعلق به جامعه اسلامی دندانپزشکان ایران است. تماس با ما

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 35 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710