| Abstract  Background: There are some studies about comparing bone  replacement grafts.The aim of this study is clinical evaluation of effect of  Osteon®(as a new bone material)& Bio-Oss® (Bovine-derived hydroxyapatite) in  the treatment of mandibular molar class II furcation defects in humans.  Method and Materials: 11 patients ( 10 females and 1 male ,age range  27 to 59 years  mean age 45.5±11.8 years ) who had at least 22 mandibular class  II buccal or lingual furcation defects were treated either with Osteon ( as case  group) or Bio-Oss (as control group) .Each defect was randomly assigned to  either case group or control group. Clinical parameters and the soft tissue and  hard tissue measurements including Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index(GI),  Gingival Recession of furcation area (GR), Pocket depth (PD),Clinical  attachment level (CAL),Horizontal defect depth (HDD),Vertical defect depth  (VDD)were recorded at base line and six months after surgery. Date  were analysed usingT-Tests or Wilcoxon.  Results:Similar healing results were observed for both treatments.Yhe  results showed significantly probing depth reduction( Case group:0.77mm &  control group: 0.84mm) and HDD reduction (Case group: 0.51 mm & control   2group: 0.8mm) and PI reduction.There was not statistically significant difference  between groups in all soft and hard tissue parameters.  Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that the effect of using  Osteon as a bone graft material is the same of Bio-Oss in the treatment of  mandibular class II furcation defects .  
   Source: Journal of Periodontology & Implant Dentistry    Full text  |