[صفحه اصلی ]   [Archive] [ English ]  
جستجو در پایگاه

جستجوی پیشرفته
..
نظرسنجی
مطالب کدام بخش سایت بیشتر مورد نیاز شماست؟
پرسش و پاسخ
جشنواره شهید هدایت
کلینیک تخصصی دندانپزشکی
مجله علمی
نمایشگاه کتاب
نمایشگاه مواد و تجهیزات دندانپزشکی
نیازمندیها
   
..
:: دوره 2، شماره 2 - ( مجموعه مقالات اندودانتیکس 1390 ) ::
جلد 2 شماره 2 صفحات 0-0 برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY WITH COMPUTERIZED CONVENTIONAL MONITORS COMPARED TO MEDICAL MONITORS IN VERTICAL ROOT FRACTURE DIAGNOSIS
چکیده:   (1757 مشاهده)

 Introduction:

  Vertical root fracture (VRF) is a complication which is chiefly diagnosed radiographically. Recently, film-based radiography has been substituted with digital radiography. At the moment, there is a wide range of monitors available in the market for viewing digital images. The present study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of medical and conventional monitors in detection of vertical root fractures.

 Material and Methods:

  In this in vitro study 228 extracted single-rooted human teeth were endodontically treated. Vertical root fractures were induced in 114 samples. The teeth were imaged by a digital charge-coupled device radiography using parallel technique. The images were evaluated by a radiologist and an endodontist on two medical and conventional liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors twice. Z-test was used to analyze the sensitivity, accuracy and specificity of each monitor. Significance level was set at 0.05. Inter and intra observer agreements were calculated by Cohen’s kappa.

 Results:

  Accuracy, specificity and sensitivity for conventional monitor were calculated as 67.5%, 72%, 62.5% respectively and data for medical grade monitor were 67.5%, 66.5% and 68% respectively. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences in detecting VRF between the two techniques. Inter-observer agreement for conventional and medical monitor was 0.47 and 0.55 respectively (moderate). Intra-observer agreement was 0.78 for medical monitor and 0.87 for conventional one (substantial).

 Conclusion:

  The type of monitor does not influence diagnosis of vertical root fractures.


 Source: Iranian Endodontic Journal

 Full Text

واژه‌های کلیدی: Diagnostic Imaging; Diagnosis; Digital Dental Radiology; Monitor; Tooth Fractures; Radiography
     
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: اندودانتیکس
دریافت: 1392/7/8 | انتشار: 1390/10/25
ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله
نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:


DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY WITH COMPUTERIZED CONVENTIONAL MONITORS COMPARED TO MEDICAL MONITORS IN VERTICAL ROOT FRACTURE DIAGNOSIS. 1. 1390; 2 (2)

URL: http://idai.ir/article-1-2084-fa.html



بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.
دوره 2، شماره 2 - ( مجموعه مقالات اندودانتیکس 1390 ) برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
جامعه اسلامی دندانپزشکان Islamic Dental Association of IRAN

کلیه حقوق سایت متعلق به جامعه اسلامی دندانپزشکان ایران است. تماس با ما

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645