<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>2</title>
<title_fa>1</title_fa>
<short_title>3</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://idai.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>9</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>10</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1390</year>
	<month>10</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2012</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>1</volume>
<number>1</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Self-ligating vs conventional brackets as perceived by orthodontists</title>
	<subject_fa>ارتودنسی</subject_fa>
	<subject>Orthodontics</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Objective:&lt;/strong&gt; To determine if there are significant clinical differences between self-ligating brackets (SLB) and conventional brackets (CB) during orthodontic treatment, as perceived by orthodontists. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; A survey was developed and distributed to evaluate how SLB compare to CB in terms of orthodontists&#039; perceptions (n = 430). Results: SLB were preferred during the initial stage of treatment based on the shorter adjustment appointments and faster initial treatment progress they provided (P &lt; .0001). On the other hand, practitioners preferred CB during the finishing and detailing stages of treatment (P &lt; .0001). CB were also preferred over SLB because they were cheaper and resulted in fewer emergency appointments. Conclusions: The orthodontists&#039; preference was significantly influenced by (1) the proportion of patients treated with SLB (P &lt; .0001), (2) the number of cases it took them to become accustomed to SLB (P &lt; .0001), and (3) the average appointment intervals associated with SLB (P &lt; .0001). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Source: &lt;/strong&gt;Angle Orthodontists &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.angle.org/doi/abs/10.2319/101311-640.1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#0033ff&quot;&gt; Full Text&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Self-ligating brackets, Perception, Bracket preference</keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://idai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-32-790&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Chase</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Prettyman</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846003412</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846003412</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Charlotte, NC</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Al</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>M. Best</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846003413</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846003413</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Steven</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>J. Lindauer</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846003414</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846003414</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name> Eser</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Tufekci</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email> etufekci@vcu.edu</email>
	<code>10031947532846003415</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846003415</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation> Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
