<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>2</title>
<title_fa>1</title_fa>
<short_title>3</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://idai.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>9</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>10</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1390</year>
	<month>10</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2012</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>1</volume>
<number>1</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>Effects of 2 bracket and ligation types on plaque retention: A quantitative microbiologic analysis with real-time polymerase chain reaction</title_fa>
	<title></title>
	<subject_fa>ارتودنسی</subject_fa>
	<subject>Orthodontics</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Introduction&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets ligated with stainless steel ligatures on dental plaque retention and microbial flora.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt; Methods&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Twenty boys (mean age, 14.2 ± 1.5 years) underwent bonding with self-ligating bracket systems and conventional standard edgewise bracket systems ligated with stainless steel ligatures with a split-mouth design. Clinical measurements, including plaque index, probing pocket depth, and bleeding on probing, were obtained before bonding, 1 week after bonding, and 3 months after bonding. Supragingival plaque samples were obtained at baseline and 3 months after bonding for the detection of bacteria. A quantitative analysis for Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus casei, and Lactobacillus acidophilus was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction. The Mann-Whitney U test and the Hotelling T2 multivariate test were used for statistical comparisons of the groups. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Results &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; The numbers of S mutans, S sobrinus, L casei, and L acidophilus were not statistically different between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets ligated with stainless steel ligatures (P &gt;0.05). The 2 archwire ligation techniques showed no statistically significant differences in plaque index, bleeding on probing, and probing pocket depth values of the bonded teeth (P &gt;0.05). All clinical parameters and the numbers of all microorganisms showed statistically significant increases from baseline to 3 months after bonding in both groups (P &lt;0.001). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Conclusions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets ligated with stainless steel ligatures do not differ with regard to dental plaque retention. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Source: &lt;/strong&gt;American Journal of Orthodontics &amp; Dentofacial Orthopedics &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ajodo.org/article/S0889-5406(13)00467-8/abstract&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#0000ff&quot;&gt;Full Text&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract_fa>
	<abstract></abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword></keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://idai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-32-1838&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Zeliha Müge</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Baka</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846008660</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846008660</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Faruk Ayhan</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Basciftci</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846008661</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846008661</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Ugur</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Arslan</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846008662</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846008662</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation> Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
