<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>2</title>
<title_fa>1</title_fa>
<short_title>3</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://idai.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>9</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>10</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1390</year>
	<month>10</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2012</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>11</volume>
<number>11</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>The Effect of 2% Chlorhexidine as Root Canal Irrigant in Pulpectomies of Primary Molars</title>
	<subject_fa>کودکان</subject_fa>
	<subject>Pediatric Dentistry</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Purpose:&lt;/strong&gt; The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) compared to normal saline solution (NSS) as an irrigant during pulpectomy in primary molars. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; Sixty-four primary mandibular molars from 42 children (average age=5.29±1.45 years old) met the inclusion criteria. CHX or NSS was allocated to each tooth by stratified block randomization. A 1-visit pulpectomy and stainless steel crown were performed by a single investigator. The clinical and radiographic diagnoses were blindly assessed by 2 calibrated investigators.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  &lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; The overall success rates in the NSS group were approximately 83%, 93%, and 97% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. In the CHX group, the overall success rates were 100%, 97%, and 93% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. Using the chi-square test, the outcomes were significantly different at 6 months, but not significant at 12 and 18 months. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/strong&gt; The use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in primary molar pulpectomies might enhance the outcome of the treatment 6 months postoperatively. Both normal saline solution and CHX irrigants gave comparable results at longer postoperative periods. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Source: &lt;/strong&gt;Journal of American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;font color=&quot;#0000ff&quot;&gt;Full Text&lt;/font&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>CHLORHEXIDINE; SALINE SOLUTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; PRIMARY TOOTH; PULPECTOMY</keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://idai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-32-929&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Phumisak</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Louwakul</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>dinon25@gmail.com </email>
	<code>10031947532846004053</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846004053</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Wilawan</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Prucksathamrongkul</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846004054</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846004054</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation></affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
