<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>2</title>
<title_fa>1</title_fa>
<short_title>3</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://idai.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>9</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>10</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1390</year>
	<month>10</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2012</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>5</volume>
<number>5</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>Evaluation of Retention of two Different Cast Post-Core Systems and Fracture Resistance of the Restored Teeth</title_fa>
	<title></title>
	<subject_fa>پروتزهای دندانی</subject_fa>
	<subject>Prothtodontics</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;b&gt;
Statement of the Problem&lt;/b&gt;: The survival of pulpless teeth restored with different post and core systems is still a controversial issue.&lt;div&gt; 

&lt;b&gt;Purpose:&lt;/b&gt; This study compared the retention of two different post and core systems and also the fracture resistance of teeth restored with these systems. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; 
&lt;b&gt;Material and Method:&lt;/b&gt; Eighty endodontically treated maxillary central incisors were sectioned perpendicular to the long axis at a point 2mm incisal to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and then the root canals were obturated.

The restored teeth were randomly divided into two equal groups of 40. One group was restored with Nickel-Chromium (Ni-Cr) post and core system and the other group with Non-Precious Gold alloy (NPG) system. For evaluation of fracture resistance of the restored teeth, the specimens (n=20 per each group) were mounted in acrylic resin blocks and a layer of polyvinyl siloxane was applied to cover the roots. Loads were applied at an angle of 45 degrees to the long axis of the teeth and measured with a universal testing machine.

The axial retention values of the studied groups (no=20) were measured on an Instron testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 19.00 and student’s t-test (α=0.05). &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; 
&lt;b&gt;Results&lt;/b&gt;: Although retention failure load for Ni-Cr system was lower than NPG system, there was no significant difference between the two systems (p= 0.7). However, fracture resistance of the teeth restored with Ni-Cr post and core system was significantly higher than NPG group (p= 0.000). &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; 
&lt;b&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/b&gt; There was no significant difference between the retention of the studied post and core systems. Although significantly higher fracture thresholds were recorded for Ni-Cr post and core group, the failure loads of both systems may rarely occur clinically.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left direction: ltr unicode-bidi: embed&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Source:
&lt;/b&gt;Journal of Dentistry Shiraz University of Medical Sciences &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left direction: ltr unicode-bidi: embed&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dentjods.sums.ac.ir/index.php/JDSUMS/article/view/1092&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#0000ff&quot;&gt;Full
Text&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract_fa>
	<abstract></abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword></keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://idai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-32-3128&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Amir Alireza</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Khaledi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>100319475328460014449</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460014449</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation> Dept. of Prosthodontic, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Shekoufeh</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Sheykhian</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email> shekoofehshaykhian@gmail.com</email>
	<code>100319475328460014450</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460014450</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Students’ Research Committee, School of Dentistry, International Branch, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Arash</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Khodaei</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>100319475328460014451</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460014451</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Students’ Research Committee, School of Dentistry, International Branch, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
