<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>2</title>
<title_fa>1</title_fa>
<short_title>3</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://idai.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>9</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>10</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1390</year>
	<month>10</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2012</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>11</volume>
<number>11</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>Effects of Glass Ionomer Temporary Restorations on Pulpal Diagnosis and Treatment Outcomes in Primary Molars</title_fa>
	<title></title>
	<subject_fa>کودکان</subject_fa>
	<subject>Pediatric Dentistry</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Purpose:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  To evaluate 1) if glass ionomer interim temporary restorations (ITR) placed for 1-3 months prior to vital pulp therapy (VPT) improved accuracy of diagnosing the pulp&#039;s clinical status and subsequent VPT success, and 2) the effect of the location of the carious lesion on VPT. &lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Primary molars (N=117) receiving pulp therapy with or without ITR were evaluated retrospectively. All teeth had caries extending &gt;50 percent into dentin caries lesion location was identified (proximal or non-proximal). Two examiners rated pulp status assessment, caries location, and pulp treatment, and correlated treatment outcomes after a mean of 34.7 months to these factors. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  VPT failed more often in first primary molars (P&lt;.001) than in second primary molars. Using ITR improved diagnosis of the pulp status, clinical success of VPT, (P=.013) and first molar VPT success (P=.02). First primary molars had more proximal lesions than second molars (P&lt;.001). Failure of VPT was greater for teeth with proximal lesions (P=.03). Use of ITR significantly improved VPT in teeth with proximal lesions (P=.007) but not non-proximal lesions (P=.38). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Conclusions&lt;/strong&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  ITR placed prior to VPT improved pulpal diagnosis and VPT outcomes. Vital pulp therapy was less successful in primary molars with proximal lesions, and ITR significantly improved the success. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Source: &lt;/strong&gt;Journal of American Academy of ‍ Pediatric Dentistry&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/aapd/pd/2013/00000035/00000005/art00004jsessionid=7bagwe01bneh.alexandra&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#0000ff&quot;&gt; Full Text&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract_fa>
	<abstract></abstract>
	<keyword_fa>ENDODONTICS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; PRIMARY MOLARS; PULP THERAPY</keyword_fa>
	<keyword></keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://idai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-32-2588&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>James A</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Comes</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>dmd1@comcat.net</email>
	<code>100319475328460012223</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460012223</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, Md., USA; private practice, York, Pa, USA</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Alison</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Campbell</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>100319475328460012224</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460012224</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Private practice, Georgetown, Texas, USA</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Natalia I.</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Chalmers</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>100319475328460012225</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460012225</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>National Institute of Health, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, Bethesda, Md., USA</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
