<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>2</title>
<title_fa>1</title_fa>
<short_title>3</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://idai.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>9</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>10</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1390</year>
	<month>10</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2012</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>11</volume>
<number>11</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>Load Distribution in Fixed Space Maintainers: A Strain-gauge Analysis</title_fa>
	<title></title>
	<subject_fa>کودکان</subject_fa>
	<subject>Pediatric Dentistry</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Purpose:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanics of space maintainers supported by primary and permanent teeth. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Photoelastic models of permanent and primary teeth with a single missing tooth space were cast, and band-and-loop, direct-bonded, and fiber-reinforced space maintainers were fabricated. Linear strain-gauges were bonded next to the teeth and in the middle of the missing tooth space. Strain gauge signals were quantified during 50 N and 100 N static axial load applications on the molar, maintainer, and anterior support at 10 KHz using a data acquisition device and associated computer software. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Regardless of the tooth being restored, strains around the molar teeth and the maintainer region were comparable between the groups under molar and maintainer loading (P&gt;.05). Under 100 N loading on the anterior support, the highest strains were observed in the direct-bonded group (P&lt;.01). Direct-bonded design led to higher strains than the band-and-loop design under 100 N maintainer loading, whereas the strain output of other designs were comparable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt; Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Load distribution of band-and-loop, direct-bonded, and fiber-reinforced space maintainers seem comparable, although direct-bonded maintainers could lead to higher strain concentrations in the buccal side due to bending moments. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Source: &lt;/strong&gt;Journal of American Academy of ‍ Pediatric Dentistry&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/aapd/pd/2013/00000035/00000001/art00018&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#0000ff&quot;&gt; Full Text&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract_fa>
	<abstract></abstract>
	<keyword_fa>DIRECT BONDED; FIBER-REINFORCED; SPACE MAINTAINER; STRAIN-GAUGE</keyword_fa>
	<keyword></keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://idai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-32-2509&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Nihal Beldüz</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Kara</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>100319475328460011937</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460011937</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Seçil</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Çehreli</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>100319475328460011938</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460011938</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Elçin</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Sağırkaya</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>100319475328460011939</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460011939</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation> Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Durdu</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Karasoy</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>100319475328460011940</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460011940</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
