<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>2</title>
<title_fa>1</title_fa>
<short_title>3</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://idai.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>9</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>10</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1390</year>
	<month>10</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2012</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>1</volume>
<number>1</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>Effect of 980-nm diode laser–aided circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy on fluorosed root surfaces</title_fa>
	<title></title>
	<subject_fa>ارتودنسی</subject_fa>
	<subject>Orthodontics</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Objective:&lt;/strong&gt;   &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; To evaluate and compare the root surface morphological changes after 980-nm diode laser–aided circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy (CSF) on fluorosed and non-fluorosed teeth. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/strong&gt;   &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; The sample comprised 27 orthodontic patients (14 males and 13 females mean age  =  17.3 years) with and without fluorosis, from whom 40 fluorosed and 40 non-fluorosed premolar teeth were extracted for orthodontic reasons. Conventional (control group) and laser-aided (experimental group) CSF was performed on fluorosed and non-fluorosed teeth indicated for orthodontic extraction, using a scalpel and a 980-nm diode laser at 2.5 W power, respectively. Subsequently, teeth were extracted, sectioned, and examined by scanning electron microscope to assess the ultrastructural changes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt; Results:&lt;/strong&gt;   &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; There were differences in surface morphology among fluorosed and non-fluorosed roots in the control group. The root specimens of both fluorosed and non-fluorosed teeth irradiated by diode laser exhibited no evidence of smear layer, laser-induced pitting or cavitation, linear cuts/markings, carbonization of surface, and heat-induced surface cracking. However, a glazed or slightly melted appearance was observed in root specimens of fluorosed teeth after diode laser irradiation. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Conclusions&lt;/strong&gt;:   &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; These findings suggest that the diode laser–aided CSF procedure is free from thermal hazard on non-fluorosed root surfaces but may provoke some thermal changes on fluorosed root surfaces. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Source: &lt;/strong&gt;The Angel Orthodontists&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.angle.org/doi/abs/10.2319/052212-419.1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#0000ff&quot;&gt;Full Text&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract_fa>
	<abstract></abstract>
	<keyword_fa>Circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy, Diode laser, Fluorosis, Orthodontic, Scanning electron microscopy</keyword_fa>
	<keyword></keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://idai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-32-1963&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Kunaal</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Dhingra</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email> kunaaldhingra@yahoo.co.in</email>
	<code>10031947532846009216</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846009216</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Periodontics, Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Kharidhi</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Laxman Vandana</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846009217</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846009217</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation> Department of Periodontics, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere, Karnataka, India</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Polavaram Vasudeva</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Girish</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846009218</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846009218</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Orthodontics, Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Charles </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Cobb</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846009219</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846009219</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
