<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>2</title>
<title_fa>1</title_fa>
<short_title>3</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://idai.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>9</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>10</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1390</year>
	<month>10</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2012</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>3</volume>
<number>3</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>Commercial mouthwashes are ineffective against oral MRSA biofilms</title_fa>
	<title></title>
	<subject_fa>بیماری های دهان</subject_fa>
	<subject>Oral Medicine</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Objective &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the activity of oral mouthwashes against biofilm forms of MRSA isolated from the oral cavity and the bloodstream. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Study Design&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  The time-kill kinetics efficacy of 7 over-the-counter mouthwashes were tested against 28 clinical MRSA biofilm isolates for 0.5, 1 and 2 min. &lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Treatments of MRSA biofilms formed by oral and bloodstream isolates were not significantly different, with mouthwashes displaying a rapid and modest anti-biofilm effect. None of the biofilm isolates were completely eradicated by the compounds tested, with a maximal killing of only approximately 70% shown by Corsodyl and Peroxyl. Maximum activity of all compounds tested was observed after 0.5 min. Fluorigard showed the poorest overall activity (57% reduction). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Conclusions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  MRSA colonize the oral cavity, and are more prevalent in institutionalized persons and the elderly. Over-the-counter mouthwashes are ineffective at killing MRSA biofilms, which has infection control implications. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Source: &lt;/strong&gt;Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oooojournal.net/article/S2212-4403(12)01766-X/abstract&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#0000ff&quot;&gt;Full Text&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract_fa>
	<abstract></abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword></keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://idai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-32-1606&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Karen</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Smith</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846007448</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846007448</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Institute of Healthcare Associated Infection, University of the West of Scotland, Ayr, UK</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Douglas</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>P. Robertson</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846007449</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846007449</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Infection and Immunity Research Group, Glasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>David</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>F.Lappin</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846007450</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846007450</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Infection and Immunity Research Group, Glasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Gordon</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Ramage</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846007451</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846007451</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Infection and Immunity Research Group, Glasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
