<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>2</title>
<title_fa>1</title_fa>
<short_title>3</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://idai.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>9</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>10</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1390</year>
	<month>10</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2012</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>6</volume>
<number>6</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Histologic Comparison of Healing Following Tooth Extraction With Ridge Preservation Using Two Different Xenograft Protocols</title>
	<subject_fa>پریودنتولوژی</subject_fa>
	<subject>Periodontology</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; The objectives of this study are to compare differences in histologic and clinical healing following tooth extraction and ridge preservation using two different xenograft treatment protocols. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; Forty-four patients with a non-molar tooth that required extraction and planned implant placement were randomly allocated into two ridge preservation protocol groups. Protocol 1 used a xenograft material consisting of 90% anorganic bovine bone in combination with 10% porcine collagen fibers combined with a resorbable bilayer membrane composed of non-cross-linked porcine types I and III collagen. Protocol 2 used a xenograft sponge composed of 70% cross-linked type I bovine collagen coated with a layer of non-sintered hydroxyapatite mineral on its surface combined with a resorbable membrane composed of type I porcine collagen cross-linked by natural ribose glycation. Following 21 weeks of healing, clinical measurements were repeated, and a core biopsy was obtained and prepared for histologic evaluation of percentages of vital bone, residual graft, and connective tissue/other (CT/other). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; Similar percentages of CT/other were detected between protocols, with no significant difference between groups (P = 0.763). A significantly greater percentage of vital bone was detected in specimens in protocol 2 (P &lt;0.001). Protocol 1 presented with a mean of 32.83% ± 14.72% vital bone, 13.44% ± 11.57% residual graft material, and 53.73% ± 6.76% CT/other. Protocol 2 presented with a mean of 47.03% ± 9.09% vital bone, no detectable residual graft material, and 52.97% ± 9.09% CT/other. Clinically, no significant differences in dimensional changes were evident between ridge preservation protocols.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt; Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;: To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate clinical and histologic differences seen when using these two xenograft protocols for ridge preservation. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Source: &lt;/strong&gt;Journal of Periodentology &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joponline.org/doi/abs/10.1902/jop.2012.120219&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#0000ff&quot;&gt;Full Text&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword> Alveolar bone loss, bone resorption, dental implants, tooth extraction</keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://idai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-32-1289&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Deana</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Clare Cook</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846005693</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846005693</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Private practice, Wilmington, NC</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Brian</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>L. Mealey</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>mealey@uthscsa.edu</email>
	<code>10031947532846005694</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846005694</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Periodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
