<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>2</title>
<title_fa>1</title_fa>
<short_title>3</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://idai.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>9</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>10</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1390</year>
	<month>10</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2012</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>6</volume>
<number>6</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Enamel Matrix Derivative, Alone or Associated With a Synthetic Bone Substitute, in the Treatment of 1- to 2-Wall Periodontal Defects</title>
	<subject_fa>پریودنتولوژی</subject_fa>
	<subject>Periodontology</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Background&lt;/strong&gt;: In this study, we compare the effects of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) associated with a hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate (HA/β-TCP) implant to EMD alone and to open-flap debridement (OFD) when surgically treating 1- to 2-wall intrabony defects. &lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; Thirty-four patients, exhibiting ≥3 intraosseous defects in different quadrants, were each treated by OFD, EMD, or EMD + HA/β-TCP in each defect. At baseline and 12 and 24 months, a complete clinical and radiographic examination was done. Pre-therapy and post-therapy clinical (probing depth [PD], clinical attachment level [CAL], and gingival recession [GR]) and radiographic (defect bone level [DBL] and radiographic bone gain [RBG]) parameters for the different treatments were compared. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; After 12 and 24 months, almost all the clinical and radiographic parameters showed significant changes from baseline within each group (P &lt;0.001). Differences in PD, CAL, and DBL scores were also seen among the three groups at the 12- and 24-month visits (P &lt;0.001). At 12 and 24 months after treatment, the EMD + HA/β-TCP group showed significantly greater PD reduction (4.00 ± 0.42 mm 4.25 ± 0.63 mm), CAL gain (3.47 ± 0.65 mm 3.63 ± 0.91 mm), and RBG (3.17 ± 0.69 mm 3.35 ± 0.80 mm) and less GR increase (0.56 ± 0.37 mm 0.63 ± 0.42 mm) compared with the OFD and EMD groups (P &lt;0.05). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; Our data support the hypothesis that the adjunct of an HA/β-TCP composite implant with EMD may improve the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the surgical treatment of unfavorable intrabony defects. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Source: &lt;/strong&gt;Journal of Periodentology &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joponline.org/doi/abs/10.1902/jop.2012.110656&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#0000ff&quot;&gt;Full Text&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Clinical trials, enamel matrix proteins, guided tissue regeneration, periodontal, periodontal diseases, transplants</keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://idai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-32-1275&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Dario</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>De Leonardis</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846005605</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846005605</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, G. d’Annunzio University, School of Dentistry, Chieti, Italy/Private practice, Rome, Italy</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Michele</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Paolantonio</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>mpaolantonio@unich.it</email>
	<code>10031947532846005606</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846005606</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, G. d’Annunzio University, School of Dentistry, Chieti, Italy</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
