نام کاربری :
رمز عبور :
  به خاطر بسپار
کلمه عبور را فراموش کرده ايد؟
ثبت نام کاربر جديد
AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE
ترمیمی: Standardizing failure,success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and mental-ceramic fixed dental prostheses

Standardizing failure,success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and mental-ceramic fixed dental prostheses

Abstract

“Nothing worthwhile is ever without complications.”

Nora Roberts

The recent increase in reports from clinical studies of ceramic chipping has raised the question of which criteria should constitute success or failure of total-ceramic prostheses. Terminologies such as minor chipping , partial chipping, technical complications , and biological complications have crept into the dental terminology and they have complicated our classification of success and failure of these crown and bridge restorations. Some journals have permitted the reporting of fractures as “complications” and they are not necessarily classified as failures in the study. One study has attempted to classify chipping fractures according to their severity and subsequent treatment . This is a promising approach to resolve the challenges to the classification of chipping fracture.

The term ‘chipping fracture’ is more descriptive than ‘chipping’ since the latter term tends to imply an event of minor consequence. Two types of statistics are reported routinely in these studies, i.e., percent success, which is a measure of restorations that survive without any adverse effects, and percent survival, which is a measure of all restorations that survive even though they may have exhibited chipping fracture or they may have been repaired. Why has this scenario occurred? One possible explanation is that many of these types of fractures are very small and do not affect function or esthetics. Another reason is that corporate sponsors prefer to use the term chipping since it does not connote failure in the sense that the term fracture does. In any event, we need to be more precise in our scientific observations of fracture and classifications of the various types of fracture including details on the location of fracture and the prosthesis design configuration. Because of the lack of standardized methods for describing chipping fractures, materials scientists are unable to properly analyze the effect of material properties and design factors on the time-dependent survival probability of ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Based on the review of clinical trials and systematic reviews of these trials, the present study was designed to develop guidelines for classifying the functional performance, success, survival, and susceptibility to chipping fracture, and subsequent treatment of ceramic and metal–ceramic restorations.

Objective

To develop comprehensive descriptive guidelines and a clinical reporting form to assist dental scientists in their analyses of chipping fracture behavior of metal–ceramic and all-ceramic prostheses with particular emphasis on veneered-zirconia restorations. These guidelines are required to optimize the recording of fracture features that can be used to differentiate ceramic chipping fracture from bulk fracture and to assist dentists in identifying subsequent treatment that may minimize the need to replace affected restorations.

A recording form for clinical fracture observations must be sufficiently clear and complete so that dental health professionals can translate the most relevant information in a context that allows their patients to fully understand the potential risks and benefits of treatment with ceramic restorations. It should clearly allow a clinician to determine whether or not a ceramic fracture constitutes a failure, which requires replacement of the prosthesis, or whether the fracture surface is relatively small or located in a nonfunctional area, i.e., one that is not contribute to occlusion, esthetics, proximal contacts, or food impaction.

To accomplish this task, a review of the relevant publications of clinical trials was necessary to identify the variability in reporting of fracture events. The reviews were focused on clinical research studies of zirconia-based FDPs and PFM FDPs, which had been monitored through recall exams for three years or more. These reports and systematic reviews of all relevant publications were published in English dental journals between 2004 and 2010.The primary focus in this review was on the susceptibility to chipping fracture or bulk fracture of veneered zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and metal–ceramic FDPs, which are also referred to in this paper as porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) FDPs.


Source: Dental Materials

Full text

بایگانی مطالب:

Standardizing failure,success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and mental-ceramic fixed dental prostheses
Longevity of posterior composite restorations: Not only a matter of materials
Durability of bones and clinical success od adhesive restoration
Correlation Of Cilnical performance with 'in vitro tests' of restorative dental materials that use polymer-based materics
The slippery slope - critical perspectives on in vitro research methodologies
Dimethacrylate network formation and polymer property evolution as determined by the selection of monomers and curing conditions
The future of dental devices is digital
Predicting clinical biological response to dental materials
Effect of Resin Cement System and Root Region on the Push-out Bond Strength of a Translucent Fiber Post
Loading Standardization of Postendodontic Restorations In Vitro: Impact of Restorative Stage, Static Loading, and Dynamic Loading
Influence of the Curing Mode on Fluoride Ion Release of Self-adhesive Resin Luting Cements in Water or During pH-Cycling Regimen
Effect of Prewarming and/or Delayed Light Activation on Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Bond Strength to Tooth Structures
Long-Term Nanoleakage Depth and Pattern of Cervical Restorations Bonded With Different Adhesives
Cross-Compatibility of Methacrylate-Based Resin Composites and Etch-and-Rinse One-Bottle Adhesives
Reparability of Aged Silorane With Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite: Micro-Shear Bond Strength and Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation
Proximal Marginal Overhang of Composite Restorations in Relation to Placement Technique of Separation Rings
Data Comparison Between Two Dental Spectrophotometers
Randomized Clinical Trial of Four Adhesion Strategies: 18-Month Results
Treatment of Invasive Cervical Resorption With Sandwich Technique Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Case Report
The Tucker Technique: Conservative Molar Inlays Preserving the Transverse Ridge

مطالب کدام بخش سایت بیشتر مورد نیاز شماست؟
پرسش و پاسخ
جشنواره شهید هدایت
کلینیک تخصصی دندانپزشکی
مجله علمی
نمایشگاه کتاب
نمایشگاه مواد و تجهیزات دندانپزشکی
نیازمندیها
   
:. کل کاربران ثبت شده: 168
:. کاربران حاضر در وبگاه: 0
:. میهمانان در حال بازدید: 8
:. تمام بازدید‌ها: 7636432
:. بازدید 24 ساعت قبل: 2769

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به جامعه اسلامی دندانپزشکان می باشد.

صفحه اصلی | درباره ما | ارتباط با ما | نقشه سایت

Created in : 0.62 seconds with 51 queries by YEKTAWEB