نام کاربری :
رمز عبور :
  به خاطر بسپار
کلمه عبور را فراموش کرده ايد؟
ثبت نام کاربر جديد
AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE
ترمیمی: Randomized Clinical Trial of Four Adhesion Strategies: 18-Month Results

 Randomized Clinical Trial of Four Adhesion Strategies: 18-Month Results

 

Authors: J Perdigão1 • M Dutra-Corrêa 1• CHC Saraceni 2• MT Ciaramicoli3 • VH Kiyan4 • CS Queiroz5

 *Jorge Perdigão, DMD, MS, PhD, Department of Restorative Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

 1-Maristela Dutra-Corrêa, DDS, MS, PhD, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Paulista University – UNIP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

 2-Cíntia H. C. Saraceni, DDS, MS, PhD, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Paulista University – UNIP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

 3-Márcia T. Ciaramicoli, DDS, MS, PhD, Department of Operative Dentistry, Paulista University – UNIP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

 4-Vanessa H. Kiyan, DDS, MS, Department of Operative Dentistry, Paulista University – UNIP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

 5-Celso S. Queiroz, DDS, MS, PhD, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Paulista University – UNIP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

perdi001@umn.edu


Abstract:



Clinical Relevance

 The 18-month retention rate of the two self-etch adhesives used in the present study was similar to that of two etch-and-rinse adhesives from the same manufacturer. However, the quality of enamel margins was significantly better for the two etch-and-rinse adhesives.
SUMMARY

 Statement of the Problem:

With Institutional Review Board approval, 39 patients who needed restoration of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) were enrolled in this study. A total of 125 NCCLs were selected and randomly assigned to four groups: 1) a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive, Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (MP, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA); 2) a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive, Adper Single Bond Plus (SB, 3M ESPE); 3) a two-step self-etch adhesive, Adper Scotchbond SE (SE, 3M ESPE); and 4) a one-step self-etch adhesive, Adper Easy Bond (EB, 3M ESPE). A nanofilled composite resin was used for all restorations. Restorations were evaluated at six months and 18 months using modified U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) parameters.

 Results:

At six months after initial placement, 107 restorations (85.6% recall rate) were evaluated. At 18 months, 94 restorations (75.2% recall rate) were available for evaluation. The 6 mo/18 mo overall retention rates (%) were 100/90.9 for MP; 100/91.7 for SB; 100/90.9 for SE; and 96.4/92.3 for EB with no statistical difference between any pair of groups at each recall. Sensitivity to air decreased significantly for all adhesives from the preoperative to the postoperative stage and was stable thereafter. Interfacial staining did not change statistically from baseline to six months; however, interfacial staining at the enamel margins was statistically worse at 18 months than at baseline for the two self-etch adhesives EB and SE. Marginal adaptation was statistically worse at 18 months compared with baseline only for EB. This tendency was already significant at the six-month recall.

 Conclusion:

 Although 18-month retention was similar for the different adhesion strategies, enamel marginal deficiencies were more prevalent for the self-etch adhesives.


Source: Operative Dentistry

  Full text

بایگانی مطالب:

Standardizing failure,success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and mental-ceramic fixed dental prostheses
Longevity of posterior composite restorations: Not only a matter of materials
Durability of bones and clinical success od adhesive restoration
Correlation Of Cilnical performance with 'in vitro tests' of restorative dental materials that use polymer-based materics
The slippery slope - critical perspectives on in vitro research methodologies
Dimethacrylate network formation and polymer property evolution as determined by the selection of monomers and curing conditions
The future of dental devices is digital
Predicting clinical biological response to dental materials
Effect of Resin Cement System and Root Region on the Push-out Bond Strength of a Translucent Fiber Post
Loading Standardization of Postendodontic Restorations In Vitro: Impact of Restorative Stage, Static Loading, and Dynamic Loading
Influence of the Curing Mode on Fluoride Ion Release of Self-adhesive Resin Luting Cements in Water or During pH-Cycling Regimen
Effect of Prewarming and/or Delayed Light Activation on Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Bond Strength to Tooth Structures
Long-Term Nanoleakage Depth and Pattern of Cervical Restorations Bonded With Different Adhesives
Cross-Compatibility of Methacrylate-Based Resin Composites and Etch-and-Rinse One-Bottle Adhesives
Reparability of Aged Silorane With Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite: Micro-Shear Bond Strength and Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation
Proximal Marginal Overhang of Composite Restorations in Relation to Placement Technique of Separation Rings
Data Comparison Between Two Dental Spectrophotometers
Randomized Clinical Trial of Four Adhesion Strategies: 18-Month Results
Treatment of Invasive Cervical Resorption With Sandwich Technique Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Case Report
The Tucker Technique: Conservative Molar Inlays Preserving the Transverse Ridge

مطالب کدام بخش سایت بیشتر مورد نیاز شماست؟
پرسش و پاسخ
جشنواره شهید هدایت
کلینیک تخصصی دندانپزشکی
مجله علمی
نمایشگاه کتاب
نمایشگاه مواد و تجهیزات دندانپزشکی
نیازمندیها
   
:. کل کاربران ثبت شده: 168
:. کاربران حاضر در وبگاه: 0
:. میهمانان در حال بازدید: 13
:. تمام بازدید‌ها: 7724963
:. بازدید 24 ساعت قبل: 2807

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به جامعه اسلامی دندانپزشکان می باشد.

صفحه اصلی | درباره ما | ارتباط با ما | نقشه سایت

Created in : 0.79 seconds with 51 queries by YEKTAWEB