<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>2</title>
<title_fa>1</title_fa>
<short_title>3</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://idai.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>9</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>10</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1390</year>
	<month>10</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2012</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>1</volume>
<number>1</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>Effectiveness of twin-block and Mandibular Protraction Appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in Class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible</title_fa>
	<title></title>
	<subject_fa>ارتودنسی</subject_fa>
	<subject>Orthodontics</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Objective:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  To test the hypothesis that twin-block and Mandibular Protraction Appliance-IV (MPA-IV) are not effective in improving the pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) dimensions among Class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Eighty-three subjects ranging in age from 8 to 14 years were divided into four groups. Group I included 30 Class I malocclusion subjects (healthy controls) group II consisted of 16 Class II malocclusion subjects (Class II controls) group III had 16 subjects in whom Class II malocclusion was treated by MPA-IV and the remaining 21 subjects formed group IV, whose Class II malocclusions were corrected by twin-block appliance. Lateral cephalograms recorded at the beginning of orthodontic treatment in group I subjects and at the beginning and end of follow-up/treatment with functional appliance in group II, III, and IV subjects were analyzed to determine the PAP dimensions. Paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey tests were applied for statistical analysis, and a P-value .05 was considered statistically significant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt; Results:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Soft palate length was decreased significantly in group III (P &lt; .05) and group IV (P &lt; .001) subjects. Soft palate thickness in group IV subjects was increased significantly as compared to group II (P &lt; .05) and group III (P &lt; .01) subjects. The improvement in soft palate inclination in group III and group IV subjects was significant (P &lt; .01). The oropharynx depth was increased significantly in group III (P &lt; .05) and group IV (P &lt; .001) subjects. The depth of the hypopharynx was increased significantly (P &lt; .01) in group IV subjects. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  The twin-block appliance was more efficient than the MPA-IV in the improvement of PAP dimensions among Class II malocclusion subjects with retrognathic mandible. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Source: &lt;/strong&gt;The Angel Orthodontists&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.angle.org/doi/abs/10.2319/083112-702.1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#0000ff&quot;&gt; Full Text&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract_fa>
	<abstract></abstract>
	<keyword_fa>Functional appliance, Twin-block, Mandibular Protraction Appliance, Pharyngeal airway passage</keyword_fa>
	<keyword></keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://idai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-32-2006&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Ashok Kumar</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Jena</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email> ashokkjena@yahoo.co.in</email>
	<code>10031947532846009415</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846009415</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation> Unit of Orthodontics, Oral Health Sciences Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Satinder Pal </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Singh</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846009416</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846009416</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Unit of Orthodontics, Oral Health Sciences Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Ashok Kumar</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Utreja </last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846009417</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846009417</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Unit of Orthodontics, Oral Health Sciences Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
